Appendix Standard-Costing Method and Spoilage

The standard-costing method simplifies the computations for normal and abnormal spoilage. To illustrate, we return to the Anzio Company example in the chapter. Suppose Anzio develops the following standard costs per unit for work done in the forming department in July 2020:

<p>A table shows standard costs per unit for work done in the forming department in July 2020</p

The table depicts standard costs per unit for work done in the forming department in July 2020. The details of the table are as follows:

  1. Direct materials: 8.50 dollars
  2. Conversion costs: 10.50 dollars
  3. Total manufacturing cost: 19.00 dollars

Assume the same standard costs per unit also apply to the beginning inventory: 1,500 (1,500 × 100%) equivalent units of direct materials and 900 (1,500 × 60%) equivalent units of conversion costs. Hence, the beginning inventory at standard costs is shown below:

<p>A table shows the beginning inventory at standard costs</p>

The table depicts the beginning inventory at standard costs. The details of the table are as follows:

  1. Direct materials, 1,500 units times 8.50 dollars per unit: 12,750 dollars
  2. Conversion costs, 900 units times 10.50 dollars per unit: 9,450 dollars
  3. Total manufacturing costs: 22,200 dollars

Exhibit 19-5, Panel A, presents Steps 1 and 2 for calculating physical and equivalent units. These steps are the same as for the FIFO method described in Exhibit 19-3. Exhibit 19-5, Panel B, presents Steps 3, 4, and 5.

Exhibit 19-5

Standard-Costing Method of Process Costing With Spoilage for the Forming Department for July 2020

Spreadsheet screenshot shows the standard-costing method of process costing with spoilage for the Forming Department for July 2020.

Panel A shows the flow of physical units which is step 1, and the output in equivalent units, in terms of direct materials and conversion costs, which is step 2.

  1. Work in process, beginning (given, page 755)

    • Physical units: 1,500

  2. Started during current period (given, page 755)

    • Physical units: 8,500

  3. To account for

    • Physical units: 10,000

  4. Good units completed and transferred out during current period

    From beginning work in process (refer to note a)

    • Physical units: 1,500

    • Direct material (product of 1,500 and the difference of 100% and 100%): 0

    • Conversion costs (product of 1,500 and the difference of 100% and 60%): 600

    Started and completed

    • Physical units: 5,500 (refer to note b)

    • Direct material (product of 5,500 and 100%): 5,500

    • Conversion costs (product of 5,500 and 100%): 5,500

  5. Normal Spoilage (refer to note c)

    • Physical units: 700

    • Direct material (700 times 100%): 700

    • Conversion costs (700 times 100%): 700

  6. Abnormal spoilage (refer to note d)

    • Physical units: 300

    • Direct material (300 times 100%): 300

    • Conversion costs (300 times 100%): 300

  7. Work in process, ending (given, page 755) (also refer to note e)

    • Physical units: 2,000

    • Direct material (2,000 times 100%): 2,000

    • Conversion costs (2,000 times 50%): 1,000

  8. Accounted for

    • Physical units: 10,000

  9. Equivalent units of work in current period

    • Direct material: 8,500

    • Conversion costs: 8,100

  10. Note a: Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 60%.

    • Note b: 7,000 physical units completed and transferred out minus 1,500 physical units completed and transferred out from beginning work-in-process inventory.

    • Note c: Normal spoilage is 10% of good units transferred out; 10% of 7,000 which equals 700 units. Degree of completion of normal spoilage in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 100%.

    • Note d: Abnormal spoilage equals total spoilage minus normal spoilage which equals 1,000 minus 700 which equals 300 units. Degree of completion of abnormal spoilage in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 100%.

    • Note e: Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 50%.

Spreadsheet screenshot shows the standard-costing method of process costing with spoilage for the Forming Department for July 2020.

Panel B shows the total costs to account for, computation of cost per equivalent unit, and assignment of costs to the units completed, spoiled units, and the units in ending work-in-process inventory. The processes are divided into three parts step-3, step-4, and step-5, details of the steps are as follows:

  1. Total costs accounted for (sum of the above A, B, and C)

    • Total cost of production (sum of direct and conversion costs): $179,500

    • Direct materials: $85,000

    • Conversion costs: $94,500

  2. Note f: Equivalent units of direct materials and conversion costs calculated in Step 2 in Panel A.

The costs to account for in Step 3 are at standard costs and, hence differ from the costs to account for under the weighted-average and FIFO methods, which are at actual costs. In Step 4, cost per equivalent unit is simply the standard cost: $8.50 per unit for direct materials and $10.50 per unit for conversion costs. The standard-costing method simplifies process costing because there is no need to calculate equivalent-unit costs. In Step 5, managers assign standard costs to units completed (including normal spoilage), to abnormal spoilage, and to ending work-in-process inventory by multiplying the equivalent units calculated in Step 2 by the standard costs per equivalent unit in Step 4. Managers measure and analyze variances as described in the appendix to Chapter 18.*

Journal entries corresponding to the amounts calculated in Step 5 are:

<p>A table shows journal entries corresponding to the amounts calculated in Step 5</p>

The table depicts journal entries corresponding to the amounts calculated in Step 5. The details of the table are as follows:

  1. Finished goods: 146,300
    • Work in process, forming: 146,300
    • To record transfer of good units completed in July.
  2. Loss from abnormal spoilage: 5,700
    • Work in process, forming: 5,700
    • To record abnormal spoilage detected in July.