Allocating Common Costs

Learning Objective 4 Allocate common costs using the stand-alone method and the incremental method

Management accountants must sometimes allocate common costs. A common cost is the cost of operating a facility, activity, or cost object when that facility, activity, or cost object is shared by two or more users. Common costs arise because each user incurs a lower cost by sharing a facility or activity than operating the facility or performing the activity independently. The cost accounting challenge is how to allocate common costs to each user in a reasonable way.

Consider Jason Stevens, a graduating senior in Seattle who has been invited to a job interview with an employer in Albany. The round-trip Seattle–Albany airfare costs $1,200. A week later, Stevens is also invited to an interview with an employer in Chicago. The Seattle–Chicago round-trip airfare costs $800. Stevens decides to combine the two recruiting trips into a Seattle–Albany–Chicago–Seattle trip that will cost $1,500 in airfare. The prospective employers will reimburse Stevens for the airfare. The $1,500 is a common cost that benefits both prospective employers because it is less than the $2,000 $1,200+$800 that the employers would have to pay if Stevens interviewed with them independently.

How should Stevens allocate common costs of $1,500 to the two employers? Two methods of allocating common costs are the stand-alone method and the incremental method.

Stand-Alone Cost-Allocation Method

The stand-alone cost-allocation method determines the weights for cost allocation by considering each user of the common cost facility or activity as a separate entity. For the common-cost airfare of $1,500, information about the separate (stand-alone) round-trip airfares ($1,200 and $800) is used to determine the allocation weights:

Albany employer:$1,200$1,200  +  $800×$1,500 = 0.60 × $1,500=$900Chicago employer:$800$800  +  $1,200×$1,500 = 0.40 × $1,500=$600  

Advocates of this method often emphasize the fairness or equity criterion described in Exhibit 14-1. The method is viewed as reasonable because each employer bears a proportionate share of total costs in relation to the individual stand-alone costs.