Exhibit 8-7 presents the variances for fixed setup overhead costs in columnar form.

Actual costs incurred: dollar 220,000
Flexible budget (same budgeted lump sum as in static budget regardless of output level): dollar 216,000
Allocated (budgeted input quantity allowed for actual output times budgeted rate): dollar 181,440 (which is 1,008 batches times 6 hours per batch times dollar 30 per hour).
Level 3: Spending variance: dollar 4,000 is the difference of 1 and 2 and has an Unfavorable effect on operating system; Production-volume variance: dollar 34,560 is the difference of 2 and 3 and has an Unfavorable effect on operating system.
Level 2: Flexible budget variance: dollar 4,000 is again the difference of above 1 and 2, and has an unfavorable effect on operating system.
Note: 1,008 batches equals 151,200 units divided by 150 units per batch.
Lyco’s fixed setup overhead flexible-budget variance is calculated as follows:
Note that the flexible-budget amount for the fixed setup overhead costs equals the static-budget amount of $216,000. That’s because there is no “flexing” of fixed costs. Moreover, because the fixed overhead costs have no efficiency variance, the fixed setup overhead spending variance is the same as the fixed overhead flexible-budget variance. The spending variance could be unfavorable because of higher leasing costs of new setup equipment or higher salaries paid to engineers and supervisors.
To calculate the production-volume variance, Lyco first computes the budgeted cost-allocation rate for the fixed setup overhead costs using the same four-step approach described in section Developing Budgeted Fixed Overhead Rates.
During 2020, Lyco planned to produce 180,000 units of Elegance but actually produced 151,200 units. The unfavorable production-volume variance measures the amount of extra fixed setup costs Lyco incurred for setup capacity it did not use. One interpretation is that the $34,560 U production-volume variance represents an inefficient use of the company’s setup capacity. However, Lyco may have earned higher operating income by selling 151,200 units at a higher price than 180,000 units at a lower price. As a result, Lyco’s managers should interpret the production-volume variance cautiously because it does not consider the effect of output on selling prices and operating income.